US | Gulf oil spill Sandbar Plan Is Bad Science At best, berms will do nothing to protect La. coastline By Nick McMaster Posted Jun 10, 2010 4:45 PM CDT Copied A bulldozer moves sand to construct a berm on East Grand Terre Island, La. to provide a barrier against the Deepwater Horizon oil spill Tuesday, June 8, 2010. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel) Bobby Jindal's plan to protect the Louisiana coastline with sandbars is more the product of political hysteria than pragmatic decision-making, Sharon Begley writes for Newsweek. Few coastal scientists think the berms—which will cost $360 million initially and need to be constantly rebuilt—will protect the wetlands from BP's oil. There is even a danger than the sandbars may block inlets that allow water to pass into the wetlands, disrupting its life processes: "You could kill the wetlands without the oil ever reaching them," says one coastal geologist. The plan will set a bad precedent, Begley notes: "BP’s oil will assault the gulf, and possibly the Atlantic, for years. Many more decisions that turn on science lie ahead." Read These Next Khamenei didn't expect strike, especially in daylight. Boebert defends leaking Hillary Clinton photo. Abduction survivor's story is one of pain and resilience. Baby born deep in Amazon rainforest is 'a source of hope.' Report an error