Technology | internet 'Death by Blogging' Story Was Pure Hooey Sensationalist Times piece spun out of nothing, says Slate By Jason Farago Posted Apr 8, 2008 11:27 AM CDT Copied Chris Smith, a sophomore at Ohio Dominican University, looks at his blog in his dorm room, Tuesday, May 1, 2007, in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato) The relentlessly self-analytical blogosphere had a field day with the recent New York Times story on bloggers allegedly writing themselves to death. But as the Internet exploded with reaction to the paper's claims, a Slate critic points out that the dire trend story was backed up by the thinnest tissue of circumstance. "Let's not kid ourselves that any white-collar work ranks high among dangerous professions," sniffs Timothy Noah in Slate. The Times piece named only two bloggers who died, and the journalist prefaced the story with a "caveat-rich" disclaimer that he had no evidence that work-related stress caused either demise. Workers are 10 times more likely to die doing construction than blogging, which should give the Times reporter "some sense of proportion." Read These Next A "horrific" incident killed 3 deputies in East Los Angeles. Jimmy Kimmel isn't happy to see Stephen Colbert go. Rare cancer claims a former Super Bowl champ. Sources say Trump's card to Epstein was signed in a strange place. Report an error